A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between prospective neighbours above the construction of the wall in a coastal web page inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes attracted countrywide focus next an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed family household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of planning breaches, environmental worries, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Moments post about René Collier plus the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a extremely publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development will work at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to build their family members dwelling. The case happens to be emblematic of wider disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, the place improvement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up citizens. In accordance with the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining built by their prospective neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their preparing authorization by developing a wall beyond the boundaries of their web site, bringing about an encroachment with a Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as a result places are issue to rigorous controls less than European and Irish environmental law. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological repercussions, significantly in a delicate coastal ecosystem such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partly created, is in the right situation. Their authorized workforce has characterised the action being an try and delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal planning disputes, in which views of The ocean are equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable endeavours from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In accordance with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-large h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances, an image which includes due to the fact develop into emblematic in the intensity on the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they have been intended to gather visual evidence of the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Situations noted, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most hanging descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these types of actions were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 were lined intimately through the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the track record and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard even more submissions on whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second during the authorized timeline.
For the core on the dispute can be a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and circumstances attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their prolonged-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair simply just trying to make a family house in accordance with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Particular Place of Conservation and say that each one performs are completed dependant on Qualified advice and accepted programs. Their lawyers have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering The ocean during a storm, do not alter the underlying facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how preparing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of construction of wall at coastal site happens to be a shorthand description for just a predicament that lots of observers see as more and more popular. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation in between personal land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier noted the businessman had Formerly been involved with area advocacy on scheduling and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from quite distinctive Specialist backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-large h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting both of those the Actual physical truth from the coastline as well as symbolic nature on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an abnormal solution.
Since the High Court proceedings go on, the end result continues to be unsure. The court docket should ascertain whether the wall as created complies with setting up permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Specific Location of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and setting up situations. But the human component remains central: neighbours who must live along with each other very long following the lawful fees happen to be paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, though the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. In addition, it underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when basic concerns like environmental security and residence legal rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of purely natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. No matter whether it will eventually be altered, removed, or done as prepared will rely on the courtroom’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will very likely continue on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin recently.