A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours in excess of the construction of a wall at a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a situation that has captivated countrywide focus next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed spouse and children residence at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of organizing breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Occasions short article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development is effective at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a corporation director respectively, search for to make their relatives home. The case has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their potential neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their arranging permission by developing a wall beyond the boundaries in their web-site, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such locations are topic to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a sensitive coastal ecosystem for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their arranging permission, and say the wall, that is partly designed, is in the right placement. Their lawful crew has characterised the action as an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their look at, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, in which sights of the sea are each remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the site, As outlined by sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times, an image which includes because become emblematic in the depth of the dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they had been intended to Acquire Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times described, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the drinking water throughout extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm h2o to photograph the internet site turned one of the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely famous that this kind of steps ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included in detail through the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 turned commonly searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the background and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard further more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second from the lawful timeline.
For the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement more than boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as built, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is called meticulous in his assessment of setting up files, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental defense and adherence to planning legislation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their very long-standing relationship to the region as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few basically looking to create a family house in accordance With all the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that all operates are actually performed dependant on Experienced assistance and accepted designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with coming into the sea during a storm, never alter the underlying info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how planning disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for your situation that lots of observers see as increasingly typical. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier mentioned that the businessman had Beforehand been associated with neighborhood advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from extremely different professional backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, became synonymous While using the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through midsection-high drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods and René Collier waded by way of waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting both equally the Actual physical actuality of the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature with the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an too much strategy.
As the High Court proceedings keep on, the result remains uncertain. The courtroom will have to decide whether or not the wall as developed complies with scheduling permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Area of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and arranging circumstances. Nevertheless the human aspect continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside along with one another extensive after the lawful costs have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case extend past that address. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and Rene Collier sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles including environmental safety and home rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a location of natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre in the dispute stands partly designed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. No matter if it is going to in the end be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as planned will count on the court’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable carry on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.